
Vantage Point is a plot-driven, action-packed thriller that begins with the President of the U.S. being assassinated, followed closely by a bombing, in a public square in Salamanca, Spain. Only, nothing is quite what it seems at first. The same events are played over and over again (until one could hear a sigh of resignation rise up from the audience), each time from a different character's point of view, until what REALLY happened is revealed. By which time a sharp-eyed film aficionado will probably have guessed most of it anyway.
Nevertheless, the film ratchets the tension up degree by degree, and there is plenty of running, shooting, and blowing things up to keep you from spending too much time trying to figure things out. So it's just possible that your mind will be (a little bit) blown by the cunning revelations at the end of the film. More likely, you will feel that you have been hypnotized and brainwashed, so clearly will you recall many events that you have seen repeated again and again.

The film utilizes a large and international cast, including some big-name Hollywood faces who, in some cases, surprise you mostly by how little time they spend on screen. Appearing in no particular order: William Hurt as the president (both of him); Sigourney Weaver as a snarky TV news producer; Dennis Quaid as the shell-shocked Secret Service agent who is a surprised as anybody else when he turns out to be a hero; Forest Whitaker as an American tourist whose camcorder captures way more than he bargained for; Matthew Fox of TV's Lost as another Secret Service guy; Bruce McGill as one of the President's handlers; and a bunch of other people I am too tired to IMDB for you, so the rest is up to you.

The music may have awakened Cosima, but it had the opposite effect on me. I struggled to stay awake through 20 minutes of prettiness that gushed forth in a continuous stream without any point of rest, without much tension or drama, without seeming able to complete a single thought until the very end. Wagner can be trying, I find, but at least most of the time he is carrying forward some dramatic scenario which gives you something to focus on. Not so with the Siegfried Idyll.

A couple of times I blinked and thought I had fallen asleep and awakened in a performance of something by Prokofiev. But then there are also whimsical allusions to Rossini's Barber of Seville Overture, and other wry turns on familiar styles of music. The story of the ballet sounds kind of weird - something about the cards, in three hands of poker, personified and promenading around the stage, forming alliances, and trying to get the better of the mischievous Joker. I can still hear snatches of it in my head 24 hours later.
Finally, the concert ended with the Sinfonia Domestica by Richard Strauss. It was a lovely piece of music for a rather large orchestra (in contrast to Wagner's chamber group and Stravinsky's Schubert-sized ensemble). It has themes that evidently symbolize the characters, activities, and relationships of members of Strauss's family, including his flamboyant actress wife and their infant son (whose theme is introduced by an oboe d'amore - an instrument rarely heard outside of Baroque music).

I just wish Strauss hadn't felt compelled to share with the world the "programme" he had in mind. I am totally "down with" a composer seeking inspiration from a text, story, or dramatic scenario - even in a piece of pure, instrumental music. But once he has achieved his aim, I think he should bury his scenario and let the audience appreciate the music on its own terms, as pure music - or let them conjure whatever imagery or narrative seems best to them. I recognize that Strauss depended on a "programme" to give his music oomph. His tone poems and operas are musical works of great warmth, variegated colors, and dramatic power, while some of his pure music (such as the Oboe Concerto) is simply pretty, but in an ice-cold way. Nevertheless, we could perhaps appreciate Sinfonia Domestica without knowing that this theme represented him, that one her, and the other one their little kid.
Conductor Mark Elder led the symphony in giving a persuasive account of all these pieces. At least two out of the three are pieces I hope to hear again, and I doubt I will hear them done better than last night. But sometimes I do wish I could write a letter to R. Strauss and encourage him to put a little more faith in his music!
IMAGES: Scenes from Vantage Point; the stair from the Wagner house in Lucerne where the Siegfried Idyll was first played; a performance of Jeu de Cartes; Richard Strauss.
No comments:
Post a Comment